PROVE IT OR IT ISN'T PROTECTED
We don't guess what an attacker would do. We do it, and show you. Opinions are cheap. Proof isn't.
V1.0-BetaScroll for more ↓
An Independent Review [ Of Code ] Nobody Wrote Alone
We're the engineers who read what the model shipped — auth gaps, edge cases, and everything else it skipped — before your users find it for you.
>Read → Flag → Fix. For every repo <
[B.02/11]//OUR MISSION
A Second Pair Of Eyes For Every Commit
Generated code reviews clean. It compiles, it passes the happy path, and it ships. What it doesn't do is tell you about the auth check that runs after the fetch, the dependency nobody picked, or the input path nothing validates.
We built Auditd to be the reviewer that reads the diff the way a senior engineer would — line by line, assuming nothing, and flagging what the model skipped before your users find it for you.
500+
Repos scanned
12K+
Findings surfaced
3 min
Avg. scan time
[C.03/11]//WHAT THE MODEL SKIPPED
Our Philosophy
WE FIX WHAT WE FIND
A list of problems is the easy half — everyone sells you that. We close what we find, in your code.
MOVE FAST. WE'LL MAKE IT HOLD
Speed is your one advantage. We make sure it holds when the users show up.
IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IT, WE FAILED
No scare tactics, no jargon dump. You should know your risk in money, not acronyms.
[N.11/11]//QUESTIONS
Have Questions? We've Got Answers
A written report covering every page and endpoint we review. Each finding has a severity, where it is, how to reproduce it and what to do about it. There's a plain-language summary at the front for anyone who doesn't write code. Fixes are a separate, separately priced step, so you're never paying to be told you have a problem and then cornered into buying the cure.
No. It's most of our work. AI writes code that runs, which isn't the same as code that's safe. The gaps are consistent enough that we know where to look first: auth that checks the wrong thing, keys sitting in the client bundle, endpoints with no rate limit, database rules left open from the first day of the project.
No. The audit is read-only. Nothing is changed, deployed or taken down. If you go ahead with remediation, we work on a branch, you review the diff, and it ships when you say it ships.
A single-site audit usually comes back within [X] working days. Remediation depends on what's in the report. You get the timeline with the findings, before you commit to anything.
You get that in writing, and you can hand it to a client, a customer or an investor. It happens less often than you'd hope.
Read access to the repo and a staging environment gets you the most depth. If that's not possible we can work black-box against a live URL, and you'll get less for it. NDA first if you want one, no argument.
Nothing, unless you want it. The retainer exists because code keeps changing, and the next thing you ship is written the same way the last thing was. Monthly or weekly reviews, and someone to call when something looks wrong.