YOU SHIPPED IT IN A WEEKEND
The model wrote your auth flow in four seconds and you merged it in ten. Nobody checked whether the session actually expires, or whether it's checked at all. We check.
Auditd exists because AI writes code faster than anyone reads it.
The model wrote your auth flow in four seconds and you merged it in ten. Nobody checked whether the session actually expires, or whether it's checked at all. We check.
Not code that holds. Keys in the client bundle, endpoints with no rate limit, database rules left open from day one. The model was never asked what happens under load.
Every issue has a severity, a location and the steps to reproduce it. If we can't show you the break, it doesn't go in the report.
Most audits end with a PDF. Ours ends with the code patched, retested, and written confirmation of what changed.
Every line you didn't read is a line you shipped on faith. Auditd reads all of them, on every push.
Point Auditd at a repo or a pull request. It reads the diff the way a reviewer would, not the way a linter does.
Learn moreEach finding comes with the failing input, the affected path, and the reason it slipped past review.
Learn moreTake the suggested patch as-is or adapt it. Re-scan runs automatically on the next push.
Learn moreIncludes:
Everything in Starter, plus:
Includes Everything in Growth, plus:
£345
Everything below high severity, cleared out in the same pass.
£445
Security headers, TLS configuration, access control on admin paths, dependency updates.
£447
UK and EU: consent handling, data subject requests, privacy policy review.
£647
Load testing and architecture review.
On request
Quoted on page count, functionality and integrations.
“It's not just a linter with a chat box bolted on. It's baked into our process now, catching things before they touch everything downstream.”
Emily Carter
Frontend Engineer
“It's not just a linter with a chat box bolted on. It's baked into our process now, catching things before they touch everything downstream.”
Emily Carter2
Frontend Engineer
“It's not just a linter with a chat box bolted on. It's baked into our process now, catching things before they touch everything downstream.”
Emily Carter2
Frontend Engineer
“It's not just a linter with a chat box bolted on. It's baked into our process now, catching things before they touch everything downstream.”
Emily Carter2
Frontend Engineer
A written report covering every page and endpoint we review. Each finding has a severity, where it is, how to reproduce it and what to do about it. There's a plain-language summary at the front for anyone who doesn't write code. Fixes are a separate, separately priced step, so you're never paying to be told you have a problem and then cornered into buying the cure.
No. It's most of our work. AI writes code that runs, which isn't the same as code that's safe. The gaps are consistent enough that we know where to look first: auth that checks the wrong thing, keys sitting in the client bundle, endpoints with no rate limit, database rules left open from the first day of the project.
No. The audit is read-only. Nothing is changed, deployed or taken down. If you go ahead with remediation, we work on a branch, you review the diff, and it ships when you say it ships.
A single-site audit usually comes back within [X] working days. Remediation depends on what's in the report. You get the timeline with the findings, before you commit to anything.
You get that in writing, and you can hand it to a client, a customer or an investor. It happens less often than you'd hope.
Read access to the repo and a staging environment gets you the most depth. If that's not possible we can work black-box against a live URL, and you'll get less for it. NDA first if you want one, no argument.
Nothing, unless you want it. The retainer exists because code keeps changing, and the next thing you ship is written the same way the last thing was. Monthly or weekly reviews, and someone to call when something looks wrong.